Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

assignment 1

Posted by jxharding 
Announcements Last Post
Announcement SoC Curricula 09/30/2017 01:08PM
Announcement Demarcation or scoping of examinations and assessment 02/13/2017 07:59AM
Announcement School of Computing Short Learning Programmes 11/24/2014 08:37AM
Announcement Unisa contact information 07/28/2011 01:28PM
assignment 1
May 11, 2010 10:04AM
halfway done, need to do q 5-9 tonight
excellent assignment, the questions are relevant to the material and the workload is relatively large
hopefully it will cover a lot of what can be asked in the exam

battling with the subnet section of question 2.
anyone else battling?
Re: assignment 1
May 11, 2010 10:01PM
can anyone pls help met to calculate returned time?
the question states :
A computer sends a timestamp request to another computer. It receives the corresponding timestamp
reply at 3:46:07 A.M. The values of the original timestamp, receive timestamp and transmit timestamp
are 13,560,000, 13,562,000 and 13,564,300 respectively.

i am trying to work out the receiving trip time which is returned – transmit.
Re: assignment 1
May 13, 2010 10:39AM
Hi jxharding.
With which subquestions do you struggle in question 2? So far I'm winning a little bit eye rolling smiley
Re: assignment 1
May 13, 2010 01:11PM
just sorted out 2.7.3 + 2.7.4 thanks Ivan smiling smiley


the return time of the question in the forum posted : convert 3:46:07 A.M. to milliseconds
thanks eugmar!

ivan, did you finish the whole assignment?
im just doing 8.2 and then done at last smiling smiley
Re: assignment 1
May 14, 2010 09:36AM
Solved 2.7.3 + 2.7.4 just now.
It's just 2.8 is giving me a headache. Sovled about half way I think. Moving on to question 3.

Still have the rest of the assigment to do over the weekend. Whoopie!

But as you said jxharding, it is an excellent assigment, and enjoying it. It's just that we have to cover a lot of work to complete the assignment. Quite hectic.
Re: assignment 1
May 14, 2010 11:18AM
also battled big time with 2.8
just did the last part on how many addresses were left
2 points down the drain, but i'll have to wait for the answer sheet for that one

Assignment 2 at least looks less work ,but same type of questions, will start way earlier on that one
Re: assignment 1
May 17, 2010 05:01PM
Any have ideas about question 9.2?

The Autonomous System (AS) number in an organization is 24101. Find the range of multicast addresses that the organization can use in the GLOP block.

I know you can use the AS number as the two middel octet in the range of 256 mulicast addresses. My question is how do one process the AS number to obtain the range of addresses?
avatar Re: assignment 1
May 18, 2010 04:16PM
Turn it into 16 bit number and slice it in half I guess. Thats what I did.

 
  ,= ,-_-. =.
 ((_/)o o(\_))
  `-'(. .)`-'
      \_/
http://ilanpillemer.com
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
Re: assignment 1
May 18, 2010 05:07PM
Hi Ivan,

You can find some more info on the GLOP block in RFC 3171 (check out http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3171)

Section 8 (in that RFC) makes it quite clear what you must do. It is quoted here for you:

8. GLOP Block (233/8)

Addresses in the GLOP block are globally scoped statically assigned
addresses. The assignment is made by mapping a domain's autonomous
system number into the middle two octets of 233.X.Y.0/24. The
mapping and assignment is defined in [RFC2770].

The answer should be obvious now.
avatar Re: assignment 1
May 23, 2010 09:37PM
Hey Telstart,

Ivan said... " know you can use the AS number as the two middel octet in the range of 256 mulicast addresses. My question is how do one process the AS number to obtain the range of addresses?"

 
  ,= ,-_-. =.
 ((_/)o o(\_))
  `-'(. .)`-'
      \_/
http://ilanpillemer.com
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem
Re: assignment 1
June 14, 2010 01:56AM
Hi ilanpillemer.
I can answer my question now thanks to Telstar resources.
Quoted from [tools.ietf.org]:

For purposes of the experiment described here, the IANA has allocated 233/8. The remaining 24 bits will be administered in a manner similar to that described in RFC 1797:

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 233 | 16 bits AS | local bits |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

2.1. Example
Consider, for example, AS 5662. Written in binary, left padded with 0s, we get 0001011000011110. Mapping the high order octet to the second octet of the address, and the low order octet to the third octet, we get 233.22.30/24.

Thanks for all your input guys!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login