And there I were today, finally understanding what all the diagrams were used for and they do not even ask one. I don't know where the questions cames from, but it bowled me out solidly!!!
I think it was unfair / unreasonable of the lecturers to ask so much theory or should I say only theory on the exam....The 20 marks on Q2, where did that come from?
Let's see if one of the new students can answer this for 20 points:
Discuss how UML address visualizing, specifying, constructing, documenting.
I gobbled it - you can think about hings, but for 20 points and that in a supp exam - they really do not want us to pass. I guess I have to ask for a remark of my first exam rather.
This exam was much more difficult than the original exam. The marks allocation (12) for the question on the differences and similarities between sequence and collaboration diagrams also seems to be too much.