Exam 2009

Worm.I thought it was pretty easy for the most part. I wasnt at all surprised to see a question about the traditional approach, but to be honest I actually expected more. Perhaps even an ERD, but maybe I should give the examiners more credit

Anyway, Ive always expected more actual UML, since as far as I am concerned, thats what OO analysis & design is about. I suppose an exam full of UML diagrams would be one that would be too long for a 2 hour paper. worm.

Did anyone notice there was no question 28 in the multiple choice section?

Thoughts?

Yea not too shabby, just some ambiguous questions. I'm just hoping (for the essay style Q's) that the lecturers read everything I wrote, because for what I found ambiguous, I covered all my bases Worm.

I also noticed #28 right away, which I suppose everyone should have. I hate it when it happens with MCQ though, think if noone saw it and answered up to #29 on the MCQ sheet, boom. Goodbye 3x marks.

Did you notice that the Use Case was identical to the one in 206?

Yep, I noticed the ambiguity. I also noted the use case being identical

I think they are going to have to mark the last questions on the MCQ manually. Cos of someone didnt see it, its not their fault for filling in to 29.

after writing the exam il i could say was.......... yep speechless

--------------------------------------------------------------------
In a long journey, even a matchstick is heavy...

The suspension is really killing me. Today is 11th, and the results are still to come

HI guys ! anyone with exam paper .[spoiler]
not valid
[/spoiler]