Past Exam
Posted by BenVP
| Announcements | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|
 |
SoC Curricula | 09/30/2017 01:08PM |
|
Demarcation or scoping of examinations and assessment | 02/13/2017 07:59AM |
|
School of Computing Short Learning Programmes | 11/24/2014 08:37AM |
|
Unisa contact information | 07/28/2011 01:28PM |
|
May 25, 2011 11:37AM |
I just noticed something, if you add all the subtotals up you get 70 not 100.
I presume the mark out of 70 will be converted to a mark out of 100.
That means your practical questions will be worth more, hence a better mark and pass!
Hope that cheers you guys up
P.S: Do you think they will mark the Gnatt charts if done in pencil?
I presume the mark out of 70 will be converted to a mark out of 100.
That means your practical questions will be worth more, hence a better mark and pass!
Hope that cheers you guys up
P.S: Do you think they will mark the Gnatt charts if done in pencil?
|
May 25, 2011 12:34PM |
Normally they specifically specify that pencil is allowed if it is. So the default is that it is not. Why take a chance? Just leave yourself more space than you normally would, and make corrections into the spare space.
Good to hear the calcs are a big percentage of the end result, indeed. I was wondering how that could be so if the main two added up to only 34%, and now we know how.
When it comes to the page replacement question (which I think one should hope for), I'm going to use 4 lines. Reference string goes on top, 3 lines for 3 frames (I don't think they'll give more frames). No little boxes for the frames. Vertical slashes will slice it all up. For some reason it helps me to consider little details like that. Somehow fixes the thing in the skull cavity.
Good to hear the calcs are a big percentage of the end result, indeed. I was wondering how that could be so if the main two added up to only 34%, and now we know how.
When it comes to the page replacement question (which I think one should hope for), I'm going to use 4 lines. Reference string goes on top, 3 lines for 3 frames (I don't think they'll give more frames). No little boxes for the frames. Vertical slashes will slice it all up. For some reason it helps me to consider little details like that. Somehow fixes the thing in the skull cavity.
|
May 25, 2011 12:56PM |
slow_eddy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Normally they specifically specify that pencil is
> allowed if it is. So the default is that it is
> not. Why take a chance? Just leave yourself more
> space than you normally would, and make
> corrections into the spare space.
What I'll do if I have time: is do it in pencil and then rewrite it in pen.
BTW: in the project management module they allowed Gnatt charts in pencil.
Edit: suppose I could put the details( a,b,c / 1, 5, 6 ect) in pen and the graph in pencil.
>
> Good to hear the calcs are a big percentage of the
> end result, indeed. I was wondering how that could
> be so if the main two added up to only 34%, and
> now we know how.
>
> When it comes to the page replacement question
> (which I think one should hope for), I'm going to
> use 4 lines. Reference string goes on top, 3 lines
> for 3 frames (I don't think they'll give more
> frames). No little boxes for the frames. Vertical
> slashes will slice it all up. For some reason it
> helps me to consider little details like that.
> Somehow fixes the thing in the skull cavity.
I usually add the symbol pf, under each column when a page fault occurs.
Helps with the calculations later on.
@Tazz: Good luck to you too.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Normally they specifically specify that pencil is
> allowed if it is. So the default is that it is
> not. Why take a chance? Just leave yourself more
> space than you normally would, and make
> corrections into the spare space.
What I'll do if I have time: is do it in pencil and then rewrite it in pen.
BTW: in the project management module they allowed Gnatt charts in pencil.
Edit: suppose I could put the details( a,b,c / 1, 5, 6 ect) in pen and the graph in pencil.
>
> Good to hear the calcs are a big percentage of the
> end result, indeed. I was wondering how that could
> be so if the main two added up to only 34%, and
> now we know how.
>
> When it comes to the page replacement question
> (which I think one should hope for), I'm going to
> use 4 lines. Reference string goes on top, 3 lines
> for 3 frames (I don't think they'll give more
> frames). No little boxes for the frames. Vertical
> slashes will slice it all up. For some reason it
> helps me to consider little details like that.
> Somehow fixes the thing in the skull cavity.
I usually add the symbol pf, under each column when a page fault occurs.
Helps with the calculations later on.
@Tazz: Good luck to you too.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.