Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Exam Paper Question 1

Posted by Geraldine 
Announcements Last Post
Announcement SoC Curricula 09/30/2017 01:08PM
Announcement Demarcation or scoping of examinations and assessment 02/13/2017 07:59AM
Announcement School of Computing Short Learning Programmes 11/24/2014 08:37AM
Announcement Unisa contact information 07/28/2011 01:28PM
Exam Paper Question 1
January 10, 2006 07:54AM
Hi

I've only looked at Question 1 of the example Exam paper so far. I have a question on Q1 (b): What exactly does the phrase "arguing directly from the inductive definition of truth values of propositional formulas" mean? Does it mean that you should give proofs similar to Theorem 2.15 on page 19 of the text book, or can you simply use equivalences such as on page 23 where they showed that conjunction can be defined in terms of nand?

Thanks for any help!

Geraldine

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login