This sentence is false.

The sentence below is true.
The sentence above is false.

 
  ,= ,-_-. =.
 ((_/)o o(\_))
  `-'(. .)`-'
      \_/

http://ilanpillemer.com
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

so both sentences are false, what wonderful logic!

gotta love contradiction... but basically, this contains exactly no information...

I think the sentence is true...don't ask me why!

GafMan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think the sentence is true...don't ask me why!

no need to ask, your vice-like grasp of logic is legendary

GafMan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you don't precede a question with an answer...
> logic forbids that!

(after i answered your question)


since you have intuition for these kinds of statements, if i were to say "i am lying" - is this statement, on its own, true or false?

And i'd say that your sacarsm is legendary too....You statement has no foundation on to which one would append some reasoning to.
Try something else

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
"If you can't Fly, Run. If you can't Walk, Crawl. But whatever you do, keep moving." Martin Luther King Jr.

you statement has no foundation on to which one would append some english to

lycium Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you statement has no foundation on to which one
> would append some english to


Mathematics, science, and English are millions of light years apart...
Now i'd like to believe that the argument is not on literature but rather or logic(Comuter Science)...[even management students know that]

that famous line from pulp fiction springs to mind...

GafMan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> lycium Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > you statement has no foundation on to which one
> > would append some english to
>
>
> Mathematics, science, and English are millions of
> light years apart...
> Now i'd like to believe that the argument is not
> on literature but rather or logic(Comuter
> Science)...

ah... a student of logic would say

>The sentence below is true.
>The sentence above is false.

is a contradiction and is not satisfiable for any interpretation over a domain model of the two sentences. i.e. it has no models.

and a student of Gafman would say: no models, no va va voom