<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Gauss Elimination and LU Decomposition</title>
<description> If I apply normal Gaussian Elimination to find L and U matrices, I tend to end up with an incorrect solution set [x1 x2 x3](Transposed) in the end. I have checked all the n-1 steps of normal GE very carefully. I don't see what I did wrong there. I think it's probably due to bad rounding off errors.

If anyone knows what I did wrong, please tell me. thanks.

:)</description><link>http://osprey.unisa.ac.za/phorum/read.php?586,164288,164288#msg-164288</link><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:06:47 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Phorum 5.2.18</generator>
<item>
<guid>http://osprey.unisa.ac.za/phorum/read.php?586,164288,164288#msg-164288</guid>
<title>Gauss Elimination and LU Decomposition</title><link>http://osprey.unisa.ac.za/phorum/read.php?586,164288,164288#msg-164288</link><description><![CDATA[ If I apply normal Gaussian Elimination to find L and U matrices, I tend to end up with an incorrect solution set [x1 x2 x3](Transposed) in the end. I have checked all the n-1 steps of normal GE very carefully. I don't see what I did wrong there. I think it's probably due to bad rounding off errors.<br /><br />If anyone knows what I did wrong, please tell me. thanks.<br /><br />:)]]></description>
<dc:creator>Spectre</dc:creator>
<category>COS2633</category><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:09:49 +0200</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>